Judge O’Connor Denies Motion To Stay Case Pending IPR

In Summit 6 v. HTC, defendants sought to stay the case pending the PTAB’s inter partes review concerning the patents-in-suit. Judge O’Connor denied defendants’ motion to stay (decision available here), noting in the process that the PTAB had not instituted the proceedings, discovery closed in one month, claim construction briefing had closed, and trial was set for the year’s end.

Posted in Judge O'Connor | Comments Off on Judge O’Connor Denies Motion To Stay Case Pending IPR

File Your Motions To Compel Prior To The Close Of Discovery

Judge O’Connor issued an Order (available here) in Williams-Pyro v. Warren Watts Technology denying a motion to compel because it was not filed during the discovery period. Judge O’Connor stated: “Motions to compel are untimely if filed after the deadline for completion of discovery.” Although there are exceptions to this general rule, Judge O’Connor found that none of the exceptions applied (discovery had closed approximately one year prior to the motion and the case was on the eve of trial).

Posted in Judge O'Connor, Practice Tips | Comments Off on File Your Motions To Compel Prior To The Close Of Discovery

New Patent Cases

Three new patent infringement cases have been filed recently: (i) Hawk Technology Systems v. Galleria Mall (complaint available here); (ii) T&CO Energy Services v. TexStarr Solutions (complaint available here); and (iii) Gourley v. Bluelounge Distribution (complaint available here).

Posted in New Lawsuits Filed | Comments Off on New Patent Cases

Judge O’Connor Denies Alice Motion For Judgment On Pleadings

Judge O’Connor issued an Order in Summit 6 v. HTC (available here) rejecting defendants’ Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment On The Pleadings. Judge O’Connor found that the patents-in-suit were not invalid under the Supreme Court’s Alice decision.

Posted in Judge O'Connor | Comments Off on Judge O’Connor Denies Alice Motion For Judgment On Pleadings

Recent Claim Construction Decisions

Judge Godbey issued claim construction decisions in Mannatech v. Wellness Qwest (available here) and Lakesouth Holdings v. Ace Evert (available here); and Judge Lynn issued claim construction decisions in Katch Kan v. Can-OK Oil Field Services (available here) and Sorkin v. Vstructural, LLC (available here).

Posted in Judge Godbey (Chief Judge), Judge Lynn | Comments Off on Recent Claim Construction Decisions

Judge Lynn Invalidates BASCOM’s Patent Under Alice

On May 15, 2015, Judge Lynn issued an extensive Order (available here) finding that BASCOM’s patent asserted against AT&T was invalid for claiming unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and the Supreme Court’s recent Alice opinion (which I discussed here). Accordingly, Judge Lynn granted AT&T’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.

Posted in Judge Lynn | Comments Off on Judge Lynn Invalidates BASCOM’s Patent Under Alice

Recent MTel Decisions

There have recently been three decisions of note in the Mobile Telecommunications v. Blackberry patent infringement case. First, Judge Lynn granted Blackberry’s motion for leave to amend its infringement contentions (decision available here). Second, Judge Lynn issued a sixty-five page claim construction opinion (available here). Third, Magistrate Judge Toliver issued an order (available here) granting in part MTel’s motion to compel. Of note, Judge Toliver determined that MTel was not entitled to obtain certain prior litigation materials, as the patents-in-suit in such earlier litigations “are entirely different from the patents-in-suit [in the instant litigation] and do not concern the same or comparable functionalities as the patents-in-suit.” Judge Toliver also determined that a party need not seek leave of court to depose a corporate deponent under Rule 30(b)(6) for an additional time, so long as the new deposition topics are different from those previously noticed.

Posted in Judge Lynn, Magistrate Judge Toliver | Comments Off on Recent MTel Decisions

Judge Kinkeade Issues Markman Rulings in Red Dog v. Kat Industries and Richmond v. Forever Gifts

Judge Kinkeade recently issued two substantial opinions construing the claims of the patents-at-issue in Red Dog v. Kat Industries and Richmond v. Forever Gifts. The opinions are available here and here.

Posted in Judge Kinkeade | Comments Off on Judge Kinkeade Issues Markman Rulings in Red Dog v. Kat Industries and Richmond v. Forever Gifts

Judge Lynn Resolves Post-Trial Motions in Melchior v. Hilite International

On July 15, 2015, Judge Lynn entered an order (available here) resolving several post-trial motions in the Melchior v. Hilite International case. Judge Lynn ruled, among other things, that there was substantial evidence of infringement, substantial evidence that the claims at issue were not anticipated or obvious, and that the Court would enter judgment awarding damages in the amount of $16,779,864.

Posted in Judge Lynn | Comments Off on Judge Lynn Resolves Post-Trial Motions in Melchior v. Hilite International

New Patent Infringement Complaints

Here’s a listing of new patent cases filed recently in the Northern District of Texas:

  1. Convergent Media Solutions v. AT&T, Netflix, Roku, and Hulu (complaints available hereherehere, and here)
  2. DBK Holdings v. Tee-Zed Products (complaint available here)
  3. Galderma v. Glenmark Generics (complaint available here)
  4. Goodson v. Titeflex (complaint available here)
  5. Gourley v. The Container Store (complaint available here)
  6. Raniere v. AT&T (complaint available here)
Posted in New Lawsuits Filed | Comments Off on New Patent Infringement Complaints