Category Archives: New Lawsuits Filed

On May 21, 2013, H-W Technology files its lawsuit (available here) against Papa John’s. H-W claims that Papa John’s infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,525,955, titled “Internet Protocol (IP) Phone with Search and Advertising Capability.” H-W accuses “Papa John’s smartphone domain … Continue reading →

On May 17, 2013, Wireless Mobile Devices (WMD) filed its lawsuit (available here) against, among others, AT&T and Verizon. WMD claims that AT&T and Verizon infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 6,560,604; 7,082,365; 7,856,315; and 7,321,826. The patents-in-suit claim technology related to … Continue reading →

On May 6, 2013, in the Northern District of Texas, Placemark filed a patent infringement lawsuit (available here) against Prudential. Placemark claims that Prudential infringes Placemark’s U.S. Patent No. 7,668,773, which claims technology relating to portfolio management. Placemark is represented … Continue reading →

On April 30, 2013, Neiman Marcus filed a declaratory judgment lawsuit (available here) in the Northern District of Texas against “Doe No. 1.” Neiman Marcus filed its lawsuit after receiving a letter from IP Nav, who was acting as “Doe … Continue reading →

On April 11, 2013, Shire filed its patent infringement lawsuit (available here) against Neos for alleged infringement of U.S. Reissued Patent Nos. RE 42,096 and RE 41,148. Shire makes and sells ADDERALL XR, which it asserts embodies the patents-in-suit. Neos, … Continue reading →

On May 20, 2013, LT Tech hit Frontrange Solutions with a complaint (available here) alleging that Frontrange infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,177,932, which claims technology relating to network based customer service. LT Tech is represented by Hao Ni of Ni, … Continue reading →

On March 1, 2013, Puttstrong filed a patent infringement lawsuit (available here) in the Northern District of Texas against The Pill. Puttstrong claims that The Pill infringes United States Patent No. D 638,080, which was issued for the invention “Putting … Continue reading →

On February 26, 2013, StoneEagle sued Stored Value Payments (complaint available here) for allegedly infringing StoneEagle’s United States Patent No. 7,792,686, which claims technology relating to medical benefits payment systems. StoneEagle is represented by Christopher Trowbridge, Beverly Whitley, Craig Cox, … Continue reading →

Bayco recently filed its patent infringement declaratory judgment lawsuit (available here) against Phillips. Bayco accuses Phillips of improperly accusing Bayco of infringing Phillips’ U.S. Patent Nos. 6,234,648, 6,250,774, and 6,692,136, which claim technology relating to lighting products. Bayco seeks a … Continue reading →

On February 8, 2013, Cassidian launched its patent infringement lawsuit (complaint available here) against NG-911 in the Northern District of Texas. Cassidian claims that NG-911’s emergency communications systems infringe Cassidian’s U.S. Patent No. 6,774,858. Cassidian is represented by Brett Govett … Continue reading →