Subscribe to ND Tex Blog
-
Recent Posts
- Patent Pilot Program To Expire In July 2021
- Repeat Copyright Plaintiff (Who Is Also Attorney Who Represents Himself) Hit With $172,173 Award For Losing Copyright Case
- Federal Circuit to W.D. Tex.: Court Congestion Not Enough To Justify Keeping Case On Transfer Motion
- Supreme Court Holds That Booking.Com May Be A Trademark
- Post-Judgment Discovery Revealing Party As Judgment-Proof Shell Company Warrants Re-Opening Case And Joining New Parties (Including Party’s Owners and Law Firm)
Archives
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
Categories
- Attorney's Fees
- Costs
- Dallas Legal Community
- Developing Law
- Discovery
- Dondi
- Ethics
- FAQs
- Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
- Federal Rules
- Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Injunctions
- Judge Boyle
- Judge Brown
- Judge Cummings (Ret.)
- Judge Fish
- Judge Fitzwater
- Judge Furgeson (Ret.)
- Judge Godbey (Chief Judge)
- Judge Hendrix
- Judge Kacsmaryk
- Judge Kinkeade
- Judge Lindsay
- Judge Lynn
- Judge Maloney (Ret.)
- Judge McBryde (Ret.)
- Judge Means
- Judge O'Connor
- Judge Pittman
- Judge Robinson (Ret.)
- Judge Scholer
- Judge Solis (Ret.)
- Judge Starr
- Local Rules
- Magistrate Judge Averitte (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Bryant
- Magistrate Judge Cureton
- Magistrate Judge Frost
- Magistrate Judge Horan
- Magistrate Judge Kaplan (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Koenig (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Lane (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Parker
- Magistrate Judge Ramirez
- Magistrate Judge Ray
- Magistrate Judge Reno
- Magistrate Judge Roach (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Rutherford
- Magistrate Judge Stickney (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Toliver
- N.D. Tex. News
- N.D. Tex. Patent Rules
- New Lawsuits Filed
- Non-N.D. Tex. Notable Decisions
- Northern District Practice Tips
- Personal
- Practice Tips
- Sanctions
- Texas Supreme Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
Category Archives: Judge Lindsay
Judge Lindsay Tosses Purported Class Action Claims Against Match.Com
On August 10, 2012, Judge Lindsay granted Match.com’s motion to dismiss a number of purported class actions filed against it in the Northern District of Texas (opinion available here). Plaintiffs were subscribers to Match.com’s online dating services, and filed suit … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Lindsay
Comments Off on Judge Lindsay Tosses Purported Class Action Claims Against Match.Com
Tesoros Trading Company Sues Tesoros Misticos, Inc. in the Northern District of Texas
On July 23, 2012, Tesoros Trading Company filed a lawsuit (available here) against Tesoros Misticos, Inc. (“TMI”) accusing TMI of committing trademark infringement. Tesoros has various “Tesoros” related marks for use in connection with wholesale and retail store services specializing … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Lindsay, New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on Tesoros Trading Company Sues Tesoros Misticos, Inc. in the Northern District of Texas
Radisson Hotels Sues Former Franchisee In the Northern District of Texas
On July 5, 2012, Radisson Hotels International filed a lawsuit (available here) against Eshnam Hospitality, Inc. in the Northern District of Texas asserting causes of action for, among other things, breach of contract, trademark infringement, false designation or origin/unfair competition, … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Lindsay, New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on Radisson Hotels Sues Former Franchisee In the Northern District of Texas
Match.com Sued Again in the Northern District of Texas
We blogged last fall about Match.com getting certain claims dismissed in a lawsuit asserting RICO, fraud, and breach of contract claims. Now, Match.com has been sued again in the Northern District of Texas (pdf copy of complaint located here). The … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Lindsay, New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on Match.com Sued Again in the Northern District of Texas
Judge Lindsay Warns Litigants to Cite Binding Precedent
On November 16, 2010, Judge Lindsay issued an opinion in Federal National Mortgage Association v. Elliot (pdf copy of opinion here). The opinion concerned plaintiff’s motion to remand to state court. None of the defendants filed a response. Finding that … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Lindsay, Northern District Practice Tips
Comments Off on Judge Lindsay Warns Litigants to Cite Binding Precedent
Judge Lindsay
Judge Lindsay was born in San Antonio, Texas, and appointed to the Northern District of Texas in 1998 by President Clinton. Judge Lindsay received his B.A. in 1974 from St. Mary’s University, and his J.D. in 1977 from the University … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Lindsay
Comments Off on Judge Lindsay
Americans With Disabilities Act Lawsuit Filed Against Jones Day in the Northern District of Texas
On October 19, 2010, one of Jones Day’s former employees filed a pro se lawsuit against the firm in the Northern District of Texas (pdf copy of the complaint in George v. Jones Day located here.) The former employee claims … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Lindsay, New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on Americans With Disabilities Act Lawsuit Filed Against Jones Day in the Northern District of Texas
Judge Lindsay Chastises EEOC For Bare-Boned Complaint
On September 28, 2010, Judge Lindsay denied Hobson Air Conditioning, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the EEOC’s complaint (pdf copy of order here). The EEOC’s complaint alleges that Hobson violated federal employment discrimination laws by subjecting one of its female employees … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Lindsay
Comments Off on Judge Lindsay Chastises EEOC For Bare-Boned Complaint
RadioShack Sues Yell Adworks For Violating Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
On September 30, 2010, TRS Quality, Inc. (owned by RadioShack) filed suit (pdf copy of the complaint here) against Yell Adworks, Inc. in the Northern District of Texas. RadioShack accuses Yell Adworks (a division of Yellow Book) of violating the … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Lindsay, New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on RadioShack Sues Yell Adworks For Violating Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
Wal-Mart Wins Dismissal With Prejudice After Filing Successful Rule 12(b)(6) Motion
In a recent order (pdf copy here) in Salinas v. Wal-Mart Stores, Judge Lindsay granted Wal-Mart’s motion to dismiss. Salinas had sued Wal-Mart, claiming that she slipped and fell in one of Wal-Mart’s Dallas stores, and that Wal-Mart’s negligence was … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Lindsay
Comments Off on Wal-Mart Wins Dismissal With Prejudice After Filing Successful Rule 12(b)(6) Motion