Subscribe to ND Tex Blog
-
Recent Posts
- Patent Pilot Program To Expire In July 2021
- Repeat Copyright Plaintiff (Who Is Also Attorney Who Represents Himself) Hit With $172,173 Award For Losing Copyright Case
- Federal Circuit to W.D. Tex.: Court Congestion Not Enough To Justify Keeping Case On Transfer Motion
- Supreme Court Holds That Booking.Com May Be A Trademark
- Post-Judgment Discovery Revealing Party As Judgment-Proof Shell Company Warrants Re-Opening Case And Joining New Parties (Including Party’s Owners and Law Firm)
Archives
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
Categories
- Attorney's Fees
- Costs
- Dallas Legal Community
- Developing Law
- Discovery
- Dondi
- Ethics
- FAQs
- Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
- Federal Rules
- Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Injunctions
- Judge Boyle
- Judge Brown
- Judge Cummings (Ret.)
- Judge Fish
- Judge Fitzwater
- Judge Furgeson (Ret.)
- Judge Godbey (Chief Judge)
- Judge Hendrix
- Judge Kacsmaryk
- Judge Kinkeade
- Judge Lindsay
- Judge Lynn
- Judge Maloney (Ret.)
- Judge McBryde (Ret.)
- Judge Means
- Judge O'Connor
- Judge Pittman
- Judge Robinson (Ret.)
- Judge Scholer
- Judge Solis (Ret.)
- Judge Starr
- Local Rules
- Magistrate Judge Averitte (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Bryant
- Magistrate Judge Cureton
- Magistrate Judge Frost
- Magistrate Judge Horan
- Magistrate Judge Kaplan (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Koenig (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Lane (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Parker
- Magistrate Judge Ramirez
- Magistrate Judge Ray
- Magistrate Judge Reno
- Magistrate Judge Roach (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Rutherford
- Magistrate Judge Stickney (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Toliver
- N.D. Tex. News
- N.D. Tex. Patent Rules
- New Lawsuits Filed
- Non-N.D. Tex. Notable Decisions
- Northern District Practice Tips
- Personal
- Practice Tips
- Sanctions
- Texas Supreme Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
Category Archives: Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Federal Circuit Issues Fresenius v. Baxter International Opinion
On July 2, 2013, the Federal Circuit issued its decision (available here) in Fresenius v. Baxter International. The court held, over a vigorous dissent by Circuit Judge Newman, that if the PTO finds that the asserted claims of the patent … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Comments Off on Federal Circuit Issues Fresenius v. Baxter International Opinion
Federal Circuit Issues En Banc Decision in CLS Bank v. Alice Corp. To Address Software Patentability Issues
On May 10, 2013, the Federal Circuit (in a 135 page opinion, available here) issued its decision en banc in CLS Bank v. Alice Corp. The opinion (as well as Chief Judge Rader’s “Additional Reflections” and Judge Moore’s dissent-in-part) is … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Comments Off on Federal Circuit Issues En Banc Decision in CLS Bank v. Alice Corp. To Address Software Patentability Issues
Federal Circuit’s Model Order Limiting Excess Patent Claims and Prior Art
The Federal Circuit’s Advisory Council has issued a Model Order Limiting Excess Patent Claims and Prior Art (available here). The key features of the Model Order are the following: Pre-Markman Patent Holder Limitation: 10 Claims Per Patent / 32 Claims … Continue reading
Posted in Developing Law, Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, Practice Tips
Comments Off on Federal Circuit’s Model Order Limiting Excess Patent Claims and Prior Art
Federal Circuit Heightens Standard for Induced Infringement
On June 25, 2013, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Commil USA v. Cisco Systems (opinion available here). The district court had instructed the jury that that it could find inducement if “Cisco actually intended to cause the acts … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Comments Off on Federal Circuit Heightens Standard for Induced Infringement
Chief Judge Rader’s NY Times Op-Ed Piece on Patent Trolls
Chief Judge Rader of the Federal Circuit has written an op-ed piece (available here) in The NY Times titled “Make Patent Trolls Pay in Court.” While I don’t agree with everything in the article, it’s certainly a worthwhile read to … Continue reading
Posted in Developing Law, Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Comments Off on Chief Judge Rader’s NY Times Op-Ed Piece on Patent Trolls
Federal Circuit Issues In Re EMC Corp. Mandamus Decision, Offering Substantial Guidance To Judges And Patent Practitioners In The Northern District of Texas On Transfer Issues
On January 29, 2013, the Federal Circuit issued its mandamus decision in In re EMC Corp. (available here). This decision, which applies in all patent infringement cases filed within the Fifth Circuit, such as in the Northern District of Texas, … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, Non-N.D. Tex. Notable Decisions
Comments Off on Federal Circuit Issues In Re EMC Corp. Mandamus Decision, Offering Substantial Guidance To Judges And Patent Practitioners In The Northern District of Texas On Transfer Issues
Textron Summary Judgment Decision Reversed by the Federal Circuit
On September 7, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Textron Innovations v. American Eurocopter Corp. (decision available here). The Northern District of Texas district court had granted summary judgment in the defendant’s favor, concluding that, based on its … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Comments Off on Textron Summary Judgment Decision Reversed by the Federal Circuit
Federal Circuit Changes Inducement Law in En Banc Akamai Decision
On August 31, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued its much anticipated en banc decision in Akamai v. Limelight (decision available here). In a 6-5 decision, the Federal Circuit overruled its 2007 BMC decision, and charted a new course for inducement … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Comments Off on Federal Circuit Changes Inducement Law in En Banc Akamai Decision
Federal Circuit’s LaserDynamics Decision Reigns in Patent Infringement Damages (Yet Again)
On August 30, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued its decision in LaserDynamics v. Quanta (available here). In LaserDynamics, the Federal Circuit reversed the district court on several grounds, and remanded for a third trial. There were three notable aspects to … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Comments Off on Federal Circuit’s LaserDynamics Decision Reigns in Patent Infringement Damages (Yet Again)
Federal Circuit Upholds (In Part) Attorney’s Fees Award in Highmark v. Allcare Patent Infringement Case
On August 7, 2012, the Federal Circuit issued a decision (available here) in Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc. Allcare (the patent owner) had appealed Judge Means’ exceptional case order (under 35 U.S.C. § 285) and award of attorney’s … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, Judge Means, Sanctions
Comments Off on Federal Circuit Upholds (In Part) Attorney’s Fees Award in Highmark v. Allcare Patent Infringement Case