Subscribe to ND Tex Blog
-
Recent Posts
- Patent Pilot Program To Expire In July 2021
- Repeat Copyright Plaintiff (Who Is Also Attorney Who Represents Himself) Hit With $172,173 Award For Losing Copyright Case
- Federal Circuit to W.D. Tex.: Court Congestion Not Enough To Justify Keeping Case On Transfer Motion
- Supreme Court Holds That Booking.Com May Be A Trademark
- Post-Judgment Discovery Revealing Party As Judgment-Proof Shell Company Warrants Re-Opening Case And Joining New Parties (Including Party’s Owners and Law Firm)
Archives
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
Categories
- Attorney's Fees
- Costs
- Dallas Legal Community
- Developing Law
- Discovery
- Dondi
- Ethics
- FAQs
- Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
- Federal Rules
- Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Injunctions
- Judge Boyle
- Judge Brown
- Judge Cummings (Ret.)
- Judge Fish
- Judge Fitzwater
- Judge Furgeson (Ret.)
- Judge Godbey (Chief Judge)
- Judge Hendrix
- Judge Kacsmaryk
- Judge Kinkeade
- Judge Lindsay
- Judge Lynn
- Judge Maloney (Ret.)
- Judge McBryde (Ret.)
- Judge Means
- Judge O'Connor
- Judge Pittman
- Judge Robinson (Ret.)
- Judge Scholer
- Judge Solis (Ret.)
- Judge Starr
- Local Rules
- Magistrate Judge Averitte (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Bryant
- Magistrate Judge Cureton
- Magistrate Judge Frost
- Magistrate Judge Horan
- Magistrate Judge Kaplan (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Koenig (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Lane (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Parker
- Magistrate Judge Ramirez
- Magistrate Judge Ray
- Magistrate Judge Reno
- Magistrate Judge Roach (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Rutherford
- Magistrate Judge Stickney (Ret.)
- Magistrate Judge Toliver
- N.D. Tex. News
- N.D. Tex. Patent Rules
- New Lawsuits Filed
- Non-N.D. Tex. Notable Decisions
- Northern District Practice Tips
- Personal
- Practice Tips
- Sanctions
- Texas Supreme Court
- U.S. Supreme Court
Author Archives: Steven Callahan
Free CLE Event With N.D. Tex. Judges — June 27, 2013
The Northern District of Texas has announced that it is offering a free CLE event. Per the Court: All attorneys and support staff are cordially invited to attend the Annual Judiciary Appreciation Luncheon, sponsored by the Federal Bar Association and … Continue reading
Posted in Dallas Legal Community, Judge Boyle, Judge Lindsay, Magistrate Judge Ramirez
Comments Off on Free CLE Event With N.D. Tex. Judges — June 27, 2013
Judge Ferguson Awards $170 Million to General Electric In Patent Infringement Lawsuit After Rejecting Mitsubishi’s Inequitable Conduct Defense
On May 28, 2013, Judge Ferguson entered a Final Judgment (available here) in the General Electric v. Mitsubishi case. The Final Judgment awarded General Electric $166.7 million in lost profits, $3.4 million in reasonable royalty damages, plus prejudgment interest. This … Continue reading
Posted in Judge Furgeson (Ret.), N.D. Tex. News
Comments Off on Judge Ferguson Awards $170 Million to General Electric In Patent Infringement Lawsuit After Rejecting Mitsubishi’s Inequitable Conduct Defense
InVue Sues Langhong Technology For Patent Infringement
On June 5, 2013, InVue filed a lawsuit (available here) against Langhong Technology in the Northern District of Texas. InVue asserts that Langhong infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 7,740,214; 7,629,895; 7,737,843; and 7,710,266, which claim technology relating to alarm security devices. … Continue reading
Posted in New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on InVue Sues Langhong Technology For Patent Infringement
MoJack Hits Tuxedo Distributors With Patent Infringement Lawsuit
On May 29, 2013, MoJack filed a patent infringement lawsuit (complaint available here) against Tuxedo Distributors in the Northern District of Texas. MoJack asserts that Tuxedo infringes U.S. Patent No. 8,448,920, which claims a small vehicle jack, through the sale … Continue reading
Posted in New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on MoJack Hits Tuxedo Distributors With Patent Infringement Lawsuit
Magistrate Judge Ramirez Recommends that H-W Technology’s Patent Infringement Lawsuit Not Be Dismissed
On May 28, 2013, Magistrate Judge Ramirez issued a ruling (available here) recommending that defendants’ motion to dismiss be denied. Defendants had claimed that H-W Technology’s complaint should be dismissed because its patent was allegedly invalid for combining two statutory classes … Continue reading
Posted in Magistrate Judge Ramirez
Comments Off on Magistrate Judge Ramirez Recommends that H-W Technology’s Patent Infringement Lawsuit Not Be Dismissed
Chief Judge Rader’s NY Times Op-Ed Piece on Patent Trolls
Chief Judge Rader of the Federal Circuit has written an op-ed piece (available here) in The NY Times titled “Make Patent Trolls Pay in Court.” While I don’t agree with everything in the article, it’s certainly a worthwhile read to … Continue reading
Posted in Developing Law, Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Comments Off on Chief Judge Rader’s NY Times Op-Ed Piece on Patent Trolls
H-W Technology Sues Papa John’s in Northern District of Texas
On May 21, 2013, H-W Technology files its lawsuit (available here) against Papa John’s. H-W claims that Papa John’s infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,525,955, titled “Internet Protocol (IP) Phone with Search and Advertising Capability.” H-W accuses “Papa John’s smartphone domain … Continue reading
Posted in New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on H-W Technology Sues Papa John’s in Northern District of Texas
Wireless Mobile Devices Sues AT&T and Verizon for Patent Infringement
On May 17, 2013, Wireless Mobile Devices (WMD) filed its lawsuit (available here) against, among others, AT&T and Verizon. WMD claims that AT&T and Verizon infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 6,560,604; 7,082,365; 7,856,315; and 7,321,826. The patents-in-suit claim technology related to … Continue reading
Posted in New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on Wireless Mobile Devices Sues AT&T and Verizon for Patent Infringement
Supreme Court Issues Its Bowman v. Monsanto Decision
On May 13, 2013, the Supreme Court decide Bowman v. Monsanto (decision available here). The Supreme Court unanimously held that an authorized sale of a patented seed does not authorize the buyer of the seed to reproduce the seeds through … Continue reading
Posted in Developing Law
Comments Off on Supreme Court Issues Its Bowman v. Monsanto Decision
Placemark Files Lawsuit Against Prudential
On May 6, 2013, in the Northern District of Texas, Placemark filed a patent infringement lawsuit (available here) against Prudential. Placemark claims that Prudential infringes Placemark’s U.S. Patent No. 7,668,773, which claims technology relating to portfolio management. Placemark is represented … Continue reading
Posted in New Lawsuits Filed
Comments Off on Placemark Files Lawsuit Against Prudential